Wednesday, 10 June 2026

2/ HOW_01_When Speed Meets Speed_AI-Induced Cognitive Overload [under review]


When Speed Meets Speed: AI-Induced Cognitive Overload, Human Limits, and a Warning from Korea


Abstract

Public discourse on the spread of artificial intelligence tends to concentrate on AI as an object: what it makes possible, what it displaces, what it threatens. This paper begins from a different question—how. That is, how AI is used—in what direction, with what intention, at what speed, and to what degree—is where the problem begins.

The paper takes three speeds as its structural premises. The first is the atemporal speed of AI—a tool with no intrinsic upper bound on processing capacity. The second is the speed of human cognition—a biological time governed by neuroplasticity, in which information is absorbed, processed, and reorganised as a necessary condition. The third is the speed of diffusion and amplification determined by the character of the social soil where these two speeds meet. South Korea is selected as the critical case where this paper’s central concept—the collision between atemporal AI and an institutionally accelerated social structure—is most compactly visible.

On these premises, the paper classifies AI-induced cognitive overload into three tiers: Operational Overload (the limits of working memory and cognitive bottlenecks), Epistemic Overload (the removal of cognitive friction and the hollowing-out of expertise), and Existential Overload (the failure of reality testing and artificial resonance). Each tier is amplified when it encounters the soil of an acceleration structure such as Korea’s. This amplification concentrates its burden upon structurally vulnerable students and workers.

The paper offers no prescription. Its aim is the work that must precede it: classifying the structure of damage, analysing the conditions under which it operates, and raising questions about direction. At high speeds, direction dictates the outcome. Finding direction comes before seeking a prescription.


Keywords

cognitive overload, brain fry, atemporal technology, artificial resonance, high-velocity society, cognitive debt